null Which Way Next for EM Local Currency Debt?
Manager Insights

Which Way Next for EM Local Currency Debt?

Manager Insights Article Income Fixed Income
June 2020
Which Way Next for EM Local Currency Debt?

Authors & Contributors

While emerging market local currency debt has seen some considerable outflows in 2020 amid wider market fears, history suggests the asset class may rebound solidly.

History Informs Current EM Local Currency Debt

The twin shocks of the COVID-19 coronavirus crisis and global oil price slump have seen a range of indiscriminate market selloffs in 2020, with emerging market (EM) bonds enduring sizable net outflows. By March 27 this year, outflows from the previous four weeks had erased about $41 billion of net inflows that EM bonds had seen in the previous year, according to Bank of America estimates, with the amount of money exiting EM local currency debt exceeding investments in hard currency.1 Periodic bouts of market volatility have also marked recent months. 

Yet for all this, we believe the asset class can recover and has previously endured some even more challenging market shocks in the past. While the COVID-19 crisis is still ongoing, there are some deeper historic EM local currency debt outflows2 from the asset class during the so-called “taper tantrum” of 2013 and the combined oil price collapse and devaluation of the Chinese yuan in 2015.3 In March, emerging markets initially saw a large selloff across different parts of the universe in line with many other risk-seeking asset classes. Yet while the current crisis has been serious, so far it is not the worst the market has ever endured. History tells us this is, as it stands, the third worst period of sustained selloffs, from assets within the sector’s JPMorgan GBI-EM Global Diversified Euro Unhedged Index, the market has seen.
While recovery in the US and developed markets has been quicker than in emerging markets, we are already seeing some signs of improvement within the EM local currency debt sector, with some currencies strengthening and some potentially attractive new investment opportunities. 

The history of selloffs from assets on the key JPMorgan GBI-EM Global Diversified Euro Unhedged Index during previous financial and economic crises also suggests EM local currency debt assets have a tendency to recover relatively quickly from deep financial shocks.4 Looking at the history of the EM local currency debt asset class, there are a number of examples of sharp selloffs and quick market rebounds afterwards. During post shock periods, returns have also tended to be above average and, historically, the deeper the shock, the higher above normal the post shock recovery tends to be. 

So far, we believe EM local currency debt appears set to behave very much in line with prior shocks, with a very sharp selloff followed by a quick rebound with the asset class recovering solidly. Based on our historical analysis of the sector, we believe the asset class also has further room to continue to recover from recent losses over coming months. While we acknowledge concerns about the potential for rising default rates across emerging markets – particularly among those dependent on hard-hit sectors such as tourism and commodities, or those dependent on remittances - we also believe local currency denominated debt markets offer a degree of flexibility and protection from wider market swings. Local currency based EM debt markets are not usually as prone to defaults or restructuring as those tied to currencies such as the US dollar because they have debt issued in local currencies and will tend to allow their currencies to depreciate instead. These countries maintain the exchange rate flexibility to react quickly to shocks.

Central Bank Intervention 

While action and intervention by developed market central banks such as the US Federal Reserve have been well chronicled throughout the COVID-19 crisis, many emerging market central banks have also been working hard to support their markets. Emerging central banks have been very active since the COVID-19 shock and some have been quite aggressive in cutting central bank overnight rates to help protect their markets. Some central banks have also gone a step further into unorthodox policies such as quantitative easing – buying debt issued by their treasuries to help finance wider deficits and to bring stability to local trades. 

While we expect market conditions to improve this year, emerging markets are not homogenous with many taking different approaches to the coronavirus pandemic and its wider economic impacts. The pace of recovery may vary widely across markets in the months ahead. Recovery will be country specific and individual markets are tackling COVID-19 in different ways. The countries in the best position to fight this are those that have better macroeconomic frameworks, with exchange rate flexibility, sound and independent central banks and countries that have accumulated savings over the last few years they can utilize right now to help them recover more quickly from the crisis.
 

FT. Investors ditch emerging market bond funds in flight to safety

Measured in Euros

Mellon analysis as at 02 June, 2020, based on historic JP Morgan GBI-EM Global Diversified EURO Unhedged index data 2006-2018

Ibid
 

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS. Mellon Investments Corporation (“Mellon”) is a registered investment advisor and subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (“BNY Mellon”). Any statements of opinion constitute only current opinions of Mellon, which are subject to change and which Mellon does not undertake to update. This publication or any portion thereof may not be copied or distributed without prior written approval from the firm. Statements are correct as of the date of the material only. This document may not be used for the purpose of an offer or solicitation in any jurisdiction or in any circumstances in which such offer or solicitation is unlawful or not authorized. The information in this publication is for general information only and is not intended to provide specific investment advice or recommendations for any purchase or sale of any specific security. Some information contained herein has been obtained from third party sources that are believed to be reliable, but the information has not been independently verified by Mellon. Mellon makes no representations as to the accuracy or the completeness of such information. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment and past performance is no indication of future performance. The indices referred to herein are used for comparative and informational purposes only and have been selected because they are generally considered to be representative of certain markets. Comparisons to indices as benchmarks have limitations because indices have volatility and other material characteristics that may differ from the portfolio, investment or hedge to which they are compared. The providers of the indices referred to herein are not affiliated with Mellon, do not endorse, sponsor, sell or promote the investment strategies or products mentioned herein and they make no representation regarding the advisability of investing in the products and strategies described herein. Please see mellon.com for important index licensing information.